TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)

Agreed, it can work for those wanting to be an admin (and know enough to be “dangerous”). I think the bigger issue comes when you want to open services to the internet, because unless you are an admin you probably don’t want to do that without a proxy (and possibly firewall) of some kind in front of your home network. Which is kinda what I was thinking with this anti-Cloudflare post. If you are interacting with the Internet you have to trust a network and hardware outside of your own. And I think it’s naive to fear the 3-letter orgs being inside Cloudflare, and then thinking that putting your data in a datacenter you don’t control is any “safer”.

I think ultimately if the 3 letter groups want your data that bad because you’re on some list, I think the internet as a whole is something you should probably be avoiding anyways. And for randoms, if they are sweeping up data like that you can be sure they would do it at more than just Cloudflare.

So does everyone here that fears Cloudflare as secretly out to get them not believe that the NSA doesn’t have their hooks in all the major datacenters? The same datacenters used by all the major web hosts people are using to “self host” for privacy.

Personally I think you have to have faith at some point that everything from your node to the destination is on the up-and-up unless you have a concrete reason to assume otherwise. Otherwise you should be suspicious of your ISP’s network and every switch/router/firewall/node your data traverses on the internet. And being that paranoid basically means anything you didn’t review the code of and compile yourself should be out of bounds.

This rant is about using Cloudflare as a proxy, nothing to do with who you buy your domain name from.

I think in this case “self host” would be on a VPS, not at home. But you definitely would want to lock it down so it was open to the public.

Using that site and doing my instance to Lemmyworld , your site is listed under the working ones. I know spam has been on the rise again on big instances, so that could be playing a part in this also.

I remember some time ago someone on here had created a site that allowed you to sign up for a time slot to DJ from their site with your own playlist. People could also write in to the DJ currently on and request songs as well.

There is also Funkwhale that allows you to share your collection and listen to others that choose to share as well.

My LG washer needed a key printed on a label on the door to connect it to the network. However that isn’t to say that once on the network that the network itself wasn’t compromised and the washer found as an easy attack surface.

Depending on what you are looking for etree has lots of music in flac. They have a BT site also @ etree.org.

Audio or video? Depending on if your group of choice allows audio taping there is always etree.

I believe Beeper is Matrix under the hood. They have just made it more accessible with a new interface and pre-installed bridges.

You would be much better off getting a seedbox and then grabbing your ISOs of it when complete.

Really? You think constant physical/verbal abuse has less merit than some shitty hit job by another YouTuber just looking for clicks because YouTube rewards drama with its algorithms.

In my world people come before things/reviews.

That video I’m sure (if like the last - I’m not clicking it GN deserves no clicks) is just more drama video and nothing “journalistic” about it. It’s just another reaction style video to feed the algorithm and give him free hyped up drama views. The sooner we stop rewarding content like this, the sooner the Internet become a little less toxic and full of bot made videos.

As soon as I saw who the video was by it’s a hard pass for me. This is drama for clicks, nothing more. Steve could do something worthwhile with his time instead of these silly reaction style videos for the YouTube algorithm. Like Linus stated, if he really had issues, and actually felt a concern about anything in the video he would have reached out. Not doing that makes this no better than the bot created trash for clicks IMHO.

I’m not OP, but probably supported in the sense that the filesystem is part of the kernel.

Edit Although that’s a Linux issue not a distro issue. A distro can “support” it in the sense of making it easier to use, but it not being part of the kernel I would still consider unsupported.