Yeah I get that occasionally, swapping to another endpoint fixes it right up
Advocate for user privacy and anonymity
Yeah I get that occasionally, swapping to another endpoint fixes it right up
Its also about monitoring what people are saying privately about your shows
And even if it is your key, if you can’t see how they made the lock then you can’t prove other keys won’t unlock it.
OSS FTW
Not to mention Epstein was able to operate freely for decades while flying out high priority definitely-surveilled-at-all-times targets out to rape kids
Make no mistake, intelligence agencies are every bit as complicit as Epstein himself, and they don’t give a flying fuck about “protecting” kids
And oh darn, didn’t you know the only solution is permanent extension of and expansions to all the patriot act bullshit that has been violating our civil liberties constantly for 20+ years?
Shucks. Welp, if it’s “for the children” or whatever excuse they use this time, I guess we have no choice!
Using weak examples and how they are better served in a different way doesn’t mean much
With push data like this you can identify something like every other member of an encrypted group chat by correlating the push notification metadata
They are demanding this for a reason
This.
If there’s a notification for an encrypted group chat, you can use that metadata to identify the devices of all parties involved in that chat, because the push system has to queue all that up and send it at the same time.
That’s just one valuable use of this data.
In steps, and you kinda drive onto it
Not great for mobile operation, however 😬
SIM card tracks location and sells it too
That isn’t what you’re getting with any cell phone?
The way I solved this problem is by using an https://invidious.io/ instance.
Logins are easy to create, so you can have one for each subscription set you want to create
Private by default, so not even the fingerprint scripts are monitoring you
And the subscriptions page lists just your subscriptions in order of most recently released, nothing else shoved in
It’s the signal metadata that they want to keep associated with an identity
They still can fulfill government requests for who is talking to who and how often
We’ll make it AI trained on all the “best” citizens, fully automatic!
Can’t have those things being used unregulated or unmonitored
They would have to vett all the closed source systems like iMessage to prove this
Which they won’t do, so it’s all down to the cops getting caught
But without someone forcing that, for consumer hardware they will just “disable” (read: not mention) the ME, because there are entities (the ones that should be enforcing secure consumer hardware) that very much enjoy the ME being there for them to take advantage of on consumer hardware.
glad to see i’m not the only one who see’s exactly how this tech will be used.
Now they won’t even need to create political ads, they can generate the most manipulative and effective ones with AI for the highest bidder!
I find it immensely useful.
I run copilot-equivalent things locally for code autocomplete and suggestions. It’s about even in terms of language specific snippets in terms of productivity gains there.
I’ve run my resume through it to have it inject HR buzzwords into all my bullet points, and i think it looks much better as a result. (The AI is way more flattering about my work that I am, myself). For something like ChatGPT specifically, i hand it my resume along with job listings and have it rate my fit, give explanations as to why, and highlight areas the company would like to know about, which makes writing cover letters trivial.
Nvidia has an AI feature that guesses and fills in frames, making it so a game only needs to generate about 30fps to get the user equivalent of 120fps, drastically improving performance on both low and high end machines even adding in the cost of running the neural net.
You’re limiting your view of “AI” into what enters the news cycle, and like most things in the news cycle, they’re almost completely off the mark and more focused on the doom and gloom aspects.
My future career is perfectly gears towards integrating AI into people’s normal workflow so people can work with the accelerating affects of technology, instead of feeling replaced by it.
All that being said, jobs like screenwriters have good reason to be worried. Even a bad AI can make a better script that 80% of what comes out of hollywood these days.
and any that code their way out of it using publicly audited and verified technologies will get sued out of business, at best.
Individuals who implement their own encryption will be targeted next, if they aren’t already.