Daily Quordle 927
6️⃣8️⃣
7️⃣5️⃣
m-w.com/games/quordle/
⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩⬜🟨⬜🟩
🟩🟨🟨🟩🟨 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩⬜⬜🟩⬜
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩\
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩
🟩⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨
🟩⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
Something so satisfying about getting them in four sequential moves.
Connections
Puzzle #424
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨
Today’s went really quick, got pretty lucky with the initial guesses. I’ve started talking to myself out loud, I feel like that helps a bit too.
Daily Quordle 925
3️⃣6️⃣
4️⃣7️⃣
m-w.com/games/quordle/
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜🟩⬜⬜🟨
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟨
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟨🟨🟩⬜🟨
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I’ve gotten pretty lucky so far, wonder how long it’ll last.
Connections
Puzzle #422
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟨🟨🟨🟨
Unintentionally said a clue for purple out loud to myself and then it just clicked.
You can also end the line with a backslash and that creates a line break without an empty line.
Wordle 1,144 4/6
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
⬛🟨🟨🟩⬛
⬛🟩🟨🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Really hoped I had it with that second-to-last guess.
Connections
Puzzle #419
🟦🟩🟦🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪
I don’t think I would have been able to figure the last one out.
Wordle 1,141 4/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
🟩⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟩🟨🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Had to rack my brain for the last one, felt a bit stupid when I figured it out.
Daily Quordle 921
4️⃣6️⃣
7️⃣9️⃣
m-w.com/games/quordle/
🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Got a bit stressed out with the last guess since I had two possibilities but I lucked out.
Wordle 1,140 4/6
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟨⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
0/5 on the first guess kind of freaked me out a bit.
Daily Quordle 917
9️⃣5️⃣
8️⃣6️⃣
m-w.com/games/quordle/
⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬜🟨⬜🟩🟩
⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟩🟩
⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜ 🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
This one was tough, almost didn’t get it.
Wordle 1,136 4/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
🟨⬛🟨🟨🟨
🟨🟩⬛🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
“And I had to do all this just to say that the environment is fucked.”
C++ is unironically my favorite language, especially coding in python feels so ambiguous and you need to take care of so many special cases that just wouldn’t even exist in C++.
It clearly just needs to lose an electron first.
I think part of it is a fundamental weakness in the Swedish judicial system where you need clear perpetrators and clear victims, meaning that if you have a group of people committing a crime and you can’t prove that they intentionally cooperated to commit the criminal act or who did exactly what, they may go free (exhibit A). The same goes if you can prove the crime but not the victims (exhibit B).
Of course the bar is higher when it comes to the police, they will pull out all the stops to prevent one of their own getting investigated, but this issue runs even deeper.
No, your take is like saying that capitalism is an infallible system, searching for evidence that capitalism is infallible, not finding any, then concluding that it’s just the internet being brainwashed by leftists.
The IEEE reference style guide actually often works just like this, the entire reference is just a number in brackets in the text and then the details of the reference is in the bibliography at the end. For example
...a high correlation as shown in [5]... [5] A.N. Author, P. Ostdoc, and O. Verworked "A paper about a thing" Department, University, City, etc.