Ah, fair enough. Thank you for explaining.
And this is true. Sadly, though, most of the US seems almost akin to a different country compared to the west coast, culturally speaking.
Ah, fair enough. Thank you for explaining.
And this is true. Sadly, though, most of the US seems almost akin to a different country compared to the west coast, culturally speaking.
Okay, I wanna know who the three downvotes were from and why? Lol.
Could you clarify how that is relevant to my comment? (Note: I’m not saying it isn’t; I’m saying I don’t see the connection.)
It both saddens me and doesn’t surprise me one bit that the US is so far behind that we don’t even have a color.
We are fucking idiots, the lot of us. Ugh…
See, I get why they did that, and I’m sure I could get used to that, but… I don’t know. It just seems weird to me, and I’m second shift. Lol.
Hell, it’s probably just because I’m not used to it, frankly. Familiarity Bias is fun, you know? Hehe.
True.
It’s all good. Thanks for correcting me! It needed to be said!
Sorry, that’s what I meant. I was thinking of lines of longitude but said the opposite. Lol. My brain does that sometimes.
Honestly, we should just do it like the original model of zones worked: 1 time zone per zone of latitude, i.e. each time zone aligned with each 15-degree-apart meridian.
None of this “Oh we used to be part of [Input Empire Name Here] so let’s keep our time zones the same as them.” Damned colonial bullshit…
Edit: Longitude, not latitude. Lol. Was thinking it but wrote the opposite. Haha.
If it was this zoomed out? I doubt it. I’m just sayin’. :P
It’s not, though:
Pop. Density = Persons / km²
Map Density = Maps / km²
They get a little closer to each other if you count phone-based maps, but with the existence of physical maps, they will almost always be different.
Ackchually, that is a map of density of the United Kingdom. Nowhere on this map does it show the density of maps found in the UK. :P
Lol.