• 1 Post
  • 110 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 21st, 2023

help-circle







  • LesserAbe@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlCareer and privacy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    What is your concern about giving your ID to LinkedIn? You mention leaks of IDs, but is that the primary reason? If leaks, what is the worst case scenario?

    For me, I think of privacy in terms of other people not knowing my business, not knowing thoughts or activities I don’t want them to, and not trying to unduly influence me, especially using information they may have learned about me.

    LinkedIn is inherently about sharing information about yourself publicly. It’s saying, “Hey, I’m {name} and I’m a {type of profession} and here are the types of work I’ve done previously.” So to me, having to give LinkedIn my id isn’t much more of a risk than the endeavor of using LinkedIn anyways. It’s giving away a little personal information in order to gain personal benefit.

    I’ve found it to be worthwhile. Since a little over ten years ago I’ve changed jobs twice and both were from headhunters contacting me. I’ve also spoke to a handful of other potential employers via headhunters. I don’t think they would have found me if it weren’t for my profile. So I’d say go for it.

    Also for what it’s worth, I don’t think the “ban” is because they object to a VPN so much as people are constantly trying to create fake profiles. Asking for ID is a way to fend off inauthentic users.

    Lastly, if you’re not already, I’d strongly recommend participating in a professional association. Despite potential awkwardness of talking with strangers, connecting with someone face to face is a much more effective way of finding work than sending applications out into the void. You’re a real person to someone when face to face and participating in activities, instead of an email that can be ignored. In the group I belong to I’ve seen multiple people show up looking for work and find it.






  • LesserAbe@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think this take misunderstands the political reality: in the U.S. we have what could charitably be called a flawed democracy. Just because laws are passed or policies enacted doesn’t mean there is majority support.

    The house of representatives is elected under rules which are determined state by state. Many states have gerrymandered districts, which is just legal cheating.

    Each state receives two senators, regardless of population. Places like North and South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, each get two senators even though they have smaller populations that individual cities in other states.

    The president is selected by the electoral college, not the popular vote.

    Supreme Court justices are appointed for life - random chance of when they die determines how many justices one party or the other gets to appoint (before we get to Republicans cheating Democrats out of an appointment).

    All of which sounds and is grim, but I take a little encouragement from the fact that the majority of Americans do support many reasonable policies and improvements.


  • LesserAbe@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldLanguage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    You’re right that there’s value in having a software repository with “vetted” apps in it. And at the same time, there’s a difference between “here’s stuff we’ve done some kind of due diligence on” and “you aren’t allowed to install anything we haven’t okayed.” That’s what Apple and now Google are doing.

    (I also think there’s value in having a word like “sideload” to describe the action of installing software not in a repository. It’s just that it’s tied up now in this paternal attitude from the big companies)



  • LesserAbe@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzHelp.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t understand the segment of people who were excited to come up with a new slur for AI. Plus it’s not even effective. It doesn’t make sense, doesn’t bite. Computers don’t clank, not even robots clank anymore. Are we in Battlestar Galactica or something