![](https://lemmy.one/pictrs/image/88c2a15d-207e-4cce-a678-469f872b07cb.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/8140dda6-9512-4297-ac17-d303638c90a6.png)
This isn’t Lua code, Lua requires commas as separators for table items.
EDIT: Retracted, it seems like Lua allows this madness
Software developer and artist.
This isn’t Lua code, Lua requires commas as separators for table items.
EDIT: Retracted, it seems like Lua allows this madness
I hope it’s going to be used instead of machine learning. Seems much more correct, secure and efficient to me.
Are you beginning to see things more clearly now?
It’s double speak. The translation is “We are evil and if you say something about what you see, we will silence you.”.
I’ve recently come to appreciate the “refactor the code while you write it” and “keep possible future changes in mind” ideas more and more. I think it really increases the probability that the system can live on instead of becoming obsolete.
Actually one of the few languages you can learn in its completeness in less than a day, so I wouldn’t really say it’s “hard to understand”. More like hard to read and understands programs written in it.
Sure, it’s advantageous in the short-term. I think this is where we misunderstand each other. What I’m trying to say is that under normal circumstances, individuals aren’t maximizing their output. They are just living as part of the community, following the unwritten rules and benefiting from that. (In the prisoner’s dilemma, this would be choice A).
If this is how everyone would act in their daily life, you would see crime, theft and abuse on an unimaginable level. No, people don’t always do what benefits them “at every individual point”. We are social creatures, acting as a community where the individuals benefit from working together. Although this has been successfully undermined by capitalism and other hierarchies.
This whole concept is also called, the Prisoner’s Dilemma, one of my favorite thought experiments because it shows how being rational can result in everyone being worse off.
Yes. The “tragedy of the commons” is a myth.
Without any limits, individual cattle owners have an incentive to overgraze the land, destroying its value to everybody.
This is factually false, because the land will be destroyed and individuals don’t benefit, not even in the short term. Commons work great (see open source software), but capitalism and power structures abuse and destroy them for short-term profit.
Interesting viewpoint, but I think the applications aren’t at fault: The operating system should ensure that the user has control of the computer at all times. I think you need to do three things to achieve that:
I guess really cold water isn’t really “wet” per-se. What did I just write…
What do you think the authors of the video don’t understand? You must have some insights if you say you understand AI better then everyone criticizing it.
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
If you know it will break, try to see how to reduce the damages.
Props for actually answering the question, and with a reasonable language too. Although Forth hasn’t clicked for me personally, and I doubt it’s a better choice for OP, it’s still a unique language design and worth studying.
The whole list:
Some highlights:
You’re thinking of this: https://craphound.com/spamsolutions.txt Maybe someone should make an AI-detector version of that.
What are you doing here on lemmy? Get back in the meeting!
I don’t see how rejecting 18th century-style factories or exploitative neural networks is a bad thing. We should have the option of saying “no” to the ideas of capitalists looking for a quick buck. There was an insightful blog post that I can’t find right now…
That said, it is completely understandable that some users may feel uncomfortable using an account to access the service. For such cases we strongly recommend hosting your own deployment of Jitsi Meet. We spend a lot of effort to keep that a very simple process and this has always been the mode of use that gives people the highest degree of privacy.
Seems like you can avoid it by self-hosting. Still a very suspicious move, kinda defeats the whole point of an alternative to big tech conference services.
Google, GitHub and Facebook for starters but may modify the list later on
Maybe they could support some auth provider from some fediverse app? That would be kinda neat.
Wow. Seems like I will never stop learning new things about Lua.