Noo! OP tell me the green stuff is cilantro.
Noo! OP tell me the green stuff is cilantro.
I too enjoy boobs. So refreshing to meet a fellow enthusiast.
*New fetish unlocked.
More than 50% of people are using Win10 and M$ are about to stop supporting it. That’s trouble brewing.
Sour-and-soapy or just sour?
Can y’all who can’t smell ants taste ants?
I’d say it’s more like a blend of vinegar and soap.
I’m a SysOps engineer at a fairly large online casino.
Aaaaaand I’ve switched sides.
But the whole point of the gag is to subvert our expectation of what happens when a princess kisses a frog. If the frog doesn’t appear until the end, then where are we going to get our expectation from?
Watch them. Start a podcast.
Remember when Elon wanted to make twitter into a super-app? Back then? In the past?
Well fuck that bird. Still, I only lost a couple of weeks’ progress that time.
We don’t like that you’re telling OP to pick two when they’ve already picked two.
It is normal, but this particular “problem” looks more like an opportunity than most. Seems silly to be complaining about it.
Anyway, is it “Fish and a …” ?
Not with that attitude.
We could do so much good with excess power generation if we wanted to. We could produce hydrogen. We could electrolyse CO2 out of the air. We could filter the plastic out of ocean water. We could analyse space radiation. We could run recycling plants. We could flood the bitcoin market. We could run a desalination plant. Why does this have to be a problem?
Make hydrogen?
So why was the problem expressed in economic terms? The practical problem isn’t “oh noes there’s a price label with a minus on it”; it’s that there’s a surplus of power which is dangerous.
In reality what that represents is an opportunity for someone to come in, and store the excess power, and sell it back to the grid when supply is lower – but energy companies only want to model the flow of money going one way.
Tick. Tick. Tick. *gets it Ahh dammit.