It can be a bigger challenge than running a prepared peace. You have to be good at thinking on the spot and very firm in the setting of the game. That is the universe you play on as well as the specific location the players are positioned in.
Gloomy
A buddhist vegan goth with questionable humour.
- 3 Posts
- 139 Comments
Gloomy@mander.xyzto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Mary E. Brunkow, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, has only 34 published papers and an H-index of 21.English5·8 days agoAwesome, thank you.
This. It’s a so much better approach than the “this is MY game” idea. Best games i had were sandboxes to have fun in. It’s even more fun when the world reacts in a reasonable manor too it.
Gloomy@mander.xyzto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Mary E. Brunkow, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, has only 34 published papers and an H-index of 21.English6·8 days agoAh, that makes sense to me. Would you mind giving an example? As i have no expertise at all in the things she is talking about it is a bit difficult to judge the content through this lens.
Gloomy@mander.xyzto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Mary E. Brunkow, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, has only 34 published papers and an H-index of 21.English4·8 days agoOkay, i looked into those and i know the type. If i wanted to name a person that embodies this i’d go to people like Graham Hancock.
How dies it apply to Hossenfelder?
Gloomy@mander.xyzto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Mary E. Brunkow, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, has only 34 published papers and an H-index of 21.English21·8 days agoA rare true neutral one out in the wild.
Gloomy@mander.xyzto Science Memes@mander.xyz•Mary E. Brunkow, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners in Medicine, has only 34 published papers and an H-index of 21.English11·8 days agoI sometimes see videos of Hossenfelder on my feed and have watched a couple. Would you mind adding some context? What are “anti-science grifters”? Sry if i’m a bit out of the loop here.
Gloomy@mander.xyztoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•And if you try to point them in that direction they go the other way.English15·12 days agoI know, i know, funny joke, haha, etc.
Let me take this way too seriously for a moment.
I think it is exactly this way of viewing the world, that has brought us to this point.
We are the anomaly here. The concept of building a closed space that has areas where light enters, but which can’t be crossed, is something that has never been seen before in the whole history of the earth. Nor is it in any way normal, by the way, to have such a massive scale of light sources around during night time. The fact that flies and other insects can’t handle this is logical and has nothing to do with being stupid. It happened so damn fast, they just never had a chance to evolve.
After 150 years of treating nature and the planet as if we had 10 others lying around just waiting for us, we have finally started to see how our way of living is harming us and the creatures we share this world with. But instead of adopting or changing, we make funny jokes about how stupid they are.
This extremely human centric view will be our downfall. And the only thing i regret is how many other creatures we will take with us in the process.
Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.
I asked my toddler about the radiation and she said “nana” and then with emphasis “nana” once more.
The downvotes are because our two methods of finding an answer are roughly equally likely to returning a reliable answer.
Mine is slightly better for the climate, maybe. That will likely change as she grows up and uses up more resources. I’ll ask her to do the math on that one later, she is busy eating a book right now.
Think of it in scale. It’s not just you. It’s millions of people. Even if every household only used one bottle over one year that still would be tons of tons of (easily to avoid) waste. And of course it’s a lot more than one bottle a year.
I use bar shampoo and body wash. Daily, because i sweat a lot (genetics too).
I use bar stuff because i have to shower daily. It prevents so much waste, because i work through soap fast, so at least i am not producing plastic waste.
If you have to wash your hair a lot, thats an argument for bar shampoo, not against.
Gloomy@mander.xyztoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•So effective it made stupid peopleEnglish8·1 month agoSee also: Fascism and World Wars
Never heard about Better Help. What are they and why are they shit?
Gloomy@mander.xyztoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•The world if christian lived by christian valuesEnglish1·1 month agoIf the scholarly aspect is of any interest to anybody, i can recommend this playlist by center place. The lectures are an excellent deep dive into christian history and concepts. I am no christian, but have spend hours listening to this gay mormon preacher teach about things like how the christian god was created from a mixture of different polytheist gods, who Baal was, or why Christians are obsessed with sex.
The style is more like a university lecture than a fast paced yt video, but i really learned a lot from it.
Gloomy@mander.xyztoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•The world if christian lived by christian valuesEnglish26·1 month agoAnd slavery. Don’t forget the slavery.
Gloomy@mander.xyztoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•The world if christian lived by christian valuesEnglish16·1 month agoIf i remember correctly (it’s been a while), then the Bible becomes a lot more coherent if you throw out the old testament, and keep to the new testament only
You mean the one that starts with four tellings of the same story, that contradict each other heavily ?
I hope so. Otherwise it would imply that they got six (!) calls, assumed it might indicate an emergency and then decided to send a tweet out before calling back.
What exactly is sad about ordering a pizza whilst being alone? Never struck me as something unusual.
I see the 20 pizza part.
Jesus…