ok.

…WHY?!

Counterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study.

In other words, well, science.

The “shining” nature of diamonds is not due to their reflective properties, it’s due to how they refract.

this is stupid. The existence of an infinite number of universes does not at all imply they must represent infinite variability.

Holy fuck they want me to pay ~70€/$ per month to read that!

as far as I understand, the only way we know is that we have observed that they move slower than light, and therefore must have mass

big side, big number

deleted by creator

this is how I expect reasonable people to react with the type of knowledge you have, yet we have multiple well known sweeteners discovered by accident.

Very much personal preference. To me linears are bad for everything, including fps games.

since they are physically blocking light, shouldn’t these block uv by the same amount it blocks all other light?

fair enough! I see now that my comment might look a little antagonizing, that was not what I wanted to express, sorry bout that.

organic iron plates, not plates of organic iron.

the plates are generated by an organic process, not out of organic materials.

you can’t just remove a word from the context and act as if that doesn’t change the meaning.

WOOᗡ

Your laptop, what brand?

uuh, its a bit offensive…

…?

Fair enough, I’m inclined to agree. It’s a relatively common error though, still leaving it ambiguous outside of circles where you expect people to express themselves with mathematical precision.

deleted by creator

well it’s ambiguous. Its also a sloppy way of expressing an increase by 80 percentage points.