![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
was met with the vitriolic, violent hatred you’d expect from a woman pointing out the misogyny of the internet’s favorite tech boy.
Yeah, I’m just gonna go ahead and say you can’t see past your own biases on this one.
was met with the vitriolic, violent hatred you’d expect from a woman pointing out the misogyny of the internet’s favorite tech boy.
Yeah, I’m just gonna go ahead and say you can’t see past your own biases on this one.
My knowledge here isn’t perfect, but I learned a lot from this discussion on the Privacy Guides forum.
You might find this chart to be helpful as well.
DivestOS is the only privacy focused OS in that list.
LineageOS’ goal is extend software support for Android phones, and /e/OS is designed for the Fair Phone. Privacy isn’t the goal, and LineageOS still phones home to Google for most things.
I’d personally go the route of getting a new phone number and a new email address.
If she needs for people to be able to reach her at her current number, I’d restrict it to people in her contacts
Even if you manage to pull the information from people search websites, her info is still out there. I’d also avoid giving out the new phone and email as much as possible.
@podverse@podcastindex.social
Is this accurate? Last I recall, the F-droid version was free of any of Google’s tracking?
deleted by creator
Podverse is a solid choice. It’s also cross-platform if that matters to you. Antenna-pod is another good choice.
Thanks!
Do you remember specifically which mattress you tried? From when I’ve looked, they have some really cheap options, and some higher quality options.
I slept on on of their cheap mattress just out of college and liked it, but I haven’t used them in a while. I’m strongly considering their HAUGSVÄR mattress as a budget-friendly/midrange option.
I beg to differ. IKEA sells at a bunch of price points with good value. The quality and durability of their furniture is better than their competition for the most part.
I distinctly remember them selling at least one mattress for more than $1000 USD. That’s not cheap unless you’re exceptionally wealthy.
Checkout Lemonade. The premium is relatively reasonable, and the yearly limit is like 100k if I remember correctly.
Older cats might be excluded.
Preexisting conditions are excluded.
Recently adopted would be fine and likely easier to insure because you don’t know their medical history.
Another independent search company with its own index is great. Repackaging Bing and Google isn’t good enough. I’d be cautious with their privacy claims though.
I’m stuck on Joplin personally, but have you taken a look at Standard Notes? I think it checks all your boxes.
You do know what community you’re posting in right?
This type of snooping covers anything you play on the screen including but not limited to Blu-Rays, Plex, Home Movies, Live TV, YouTube, and Netflix. It’s incredibly invasive and harmful to the end user, especially when the raw data is inevitably leaked to the world at large.
Would an encrypted backup using something like Crytomator or Rsync fit your needs? It would allow you to use the cheaper cloud services without letting them see the content of your files.
Proton Drive is another good option.
@rysiek Fair enough! Not official in the sense that the Bitwarden team doesn’t support it I suppose.
It definitely has some community backing though.
I believe Vaultwarden works with SQLite and Postgres if that were a concern.
https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/wiki/Using-the-PostgreSQL-Backend
Bitwarden has a great free tier, it’s open source, and cross platform. I highly recommend it!
https://bitwarden.com/help/import-from-chrome/
If you want something that’s not cloud focused, check out KeepassXC too!
Ars Technica – Bias and Credibility
Bias Rating: Least Biased
Factual Reporting: High
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: Mostly Free
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: High Credibility
You are assuming intent, and ignoring the false statements made. What I see is them hiring a third party to do an investigation, exactly what the public called for. Would you rather the former employee pay for it?
There was no threat, only a statement of fact that the evidence was strong enough for a defamation case, and that they did not wish do go down that path.