It’s not a “magic pill”, it’s another tool. We’re not saying that it will magically fix everything, it will just make certain types of errors less probable.
If you want bug-free code, will you (A) use a tool that makes it easier, or (B) use the same tool as before?
“Skill issue” is not an answer.
Like the fox?
Apt is written in more C++ than C, so it would be apt to select a language that is similar.
What does this mean for the end-user? By how they worded it…
the APT packaging tool next year will begin requiring a Rust compiler
it seems like you need a Rust compiler as a dependency for simply having Apt installed on your system.
Debian and most distros based on it do not even install a C++ compiler by default, and apt is mostly written in C++.
Does that really have the same results as the example scenario I described? How would you even access the unnamed struct, since it is unnamed?
What’s the point of this? If you have a struct within a struct, you probably want them to nest. The -fms-extensions will un-nest them, which is not what you mean.
// If I type this:
struct test {
int a;
struct test2 {
char b;
float c;
};
double d;
};
struct test my_test;
// I want this to happen:
my_test.test2.b = 'x'; //assigning the members of the nested struct
my_test.test2.c = 3.141; //this will work
printf("%f", my_test.c); //this will NOT work since c is a property of test2
Time to chew the cartridge?
I sense a fork coming
Dino would be the fermionic superpartner of a D boson, with analogy to the gauge bosons.
W boson; superpartner is Wino
Z boson; superpartner is Zino
It was the emojis used as bullet points, some that were not situationally relevant.
My robot detector is going off… looks GPT’d…
Also like the Joker, Saskatchewan is fictional
Genetic engineering has never been this cute
Your spoiler failed
Secretary bird is Deinonychus
Interesting
I am not the person who said “C++ has rotted their brain”. I have not expressed a similar sentiment. I have never said that “borrow checker fixes all”, in fact I said that it will not magically fix everything.
Is your brain infallible?
The strategy is not to 100% eliminate every bug in existence or theory, bugs are inevitable. The strategy is Swiss cheese security.
Something is better than nothing. Therefore (brain + something) > (brain + nothing). As long as “something” works to prevent bugs, to any extent, it will result in fewer bugs.