good look

lookin gauche

It’s still an upgrade from the books, sadly.

writes a lot, anyway

👍 thot

👈 THOUGHT

put this in your pipe and smoke it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYoF46qMuU4

mods are drunk quick post pictures of your houses gogogo

whats wrong with poetry? this guys a douche

TIL NASA is a fairy.

4chan?

I claim the Isle of Wight.

I only purchased this toothbrush because that was the only way to get the water-resistant Corporate Surveillance Device that I wanted for the bathroom.

why
in
the
name
of
christ

I love Miles’ work. Hes one of the few people of approximately my generation speaking openly and directly about the actual, observed risks involved in AI without hype or drama, and that in a very accessible way.

AI told me the Pope shit in the woods and that bears are Catholic.

I think you’re being downvoted or ignored by most because the way you’ve formatted your post is strikingly similar to the way some bots spam ads for their malicious services. Glancing at your post history it’s clear to me that you just want to actually watch the fight.

As far as that goes, afaik it’s notoriously difficult to find streams things like fights and sportsballs as they happen, but I know for a fact you’re not the only pirate looking for things like that, so I’d try to find a sports dedicated network and see if the fight gets uploaded within a day or so. Hopefully someone with specific knowledge to your question comes along, maybe there’s a stream?

Good luck.

I watched this for about twenty minutes. It is my frank opinion that this upload is inferior to the random rip I perpetually keep on my phone. I honestly don’t like the color change (this may simply be that I am unused to it), but worse, there are lines and flickers and film grain effects that are distracting which are not present on my rando-rip.

Hey, uh, fantasykid. What’s going on with your post history? If I didn’t know better, I’d say you made an account to specifically post just from a single source and interact with the community not at all otherwise. It’s not like that would be against any rules or anything; you could be a bot for all anyone knows.

As for the article itself… If I didn’t know better, I’d say a bot wrote it. From the byline attribution of “NEWSLINE PAPER” (If that name isn’t enough to assuage your worry, worry no more: it’s BASED ON TRUSTED SOURCE, too) to the attributed but unreferenced “recent study published in the journal Brain and Behavior” to the conflation of the perception of time’s passage during flow states with the actual dilation of time due to relativistic effects to the bad, false explanation of this conflation attributed to “Space” instead of the introductory paragraph of the aforementioned unreferenced but attributed study (in which it uses a comparison between relativistic effects and the flow states as a metaphor)- I’d say this is a bad faith effort at imitating legitimate science journalism in order to generate click revenue.

uh,