Nice off-topic comment. Pretty sure by now everybody is aware of that (and other posts) on the topic of using a license.
All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Nice off-topic comment. Pretty sure by now everybody is aware of that (and other posts) on the topic of using a license.
Is it an external leak? Or an internal one?
My guess would be internal to the engine/compartment somewhere, with limited or no access to the broken part, or else they would have repaired it instead of just monitoring it.
My guess is that NASA has done the math and it says this is an extremely unlikely scenario to have happen, but they could do it if they absolutely needed to.
I guess I’m used to the old NASA, where they would never ‘play the Vegas odds’, risk the astronauts under any condition, besides the normal risks of just launching in a rocket in the first place.
Interesting to see how having a private business corporation involved would change that mindset.
I do hope you’re right, for the crews sake.
Its not great, but not nearly as bad as Challenger SRB O-rings.
I was speaking more from the managerial and not the engineering point of view, when I made that comment about the vibes. How management politics underplayed problems until a disaster happened
My point still stands though. If the leak grows large during the trip, and all the helium escapes, then they can’t maneuver the craft, which means they can’t get at the right angle to reenter the atmosphere without burning up.
And if the shuttle tiles situation tells us anything, they don’t take everything with them up into space, to do on-site emergency repairs.
Even if they brought extra helium with them, if the leak is widened (launch vibrations, etc.) to a point where the helium escapes too quickly now, before the whole reentry sequence completes, then they’re stuck.
Just feels like driving a car across the Mojave Desert, with a known tire leak, and hoping the leak doesn’t get any worse. Feels like a ‘roll of the dice’ moment.
From the article …
Stich explained that the plan is to monitor the leak in the lead-up to launch and, after reaching the International Space Station, reassess the leak rate.
I got major ‘O-ring’ vibes after reading that.
I can’t believe they’re going to fly with that leak.
‘but Earth should be safe this time’
Did they really need to add that qualifier to the title?
I mean, like if the Earth gets destroyed, there won’t be any lawyers around that’ll sue because of an incorrect article.
I don’t want to ask any kind of LLM anything at all. Ugh.
While my default/off-the-cuff answer would be the same as yours, if I travelled fifty years into the future, and had a ‘discussion’ with a LLM that was specific to the topic being discussed, I would probably be ok with that (as long as it was programmed properly and trained on good (not cheapest) data).
Time will tell, but the future will pimp slap you if you try to avoid it. Best to surf it the best you can.
Not sure if I would want to ask the kind of LLM that’s programmed from that site about romance / love life questions.
For any particular reason?
I get that question asked frequently, so I’ll just point you to this comment from me, which explains. …
https://lemmy.world/comment/9744090
Otherwise, the description of the link is sufficient to get an idea of what its about.
Was that supposed an anti paywall link or something
Nope. Its a Creative Comments license for my comment.
Wow, makes one fearful to even use AWS. Yikes!
Definately required reading for those who use AWS.
They’re really not that obnoxious. The folks getting their panties in wads about it are either fools, or astroturfers. You do you chief, and I for one support this. Folks get overly triggered about all sorts of stupid little shit, don’t let them get you down. Someday soon a bunch of us will probably wish we did something like what you’re doing.
Appreciate the kind words.
Yeah I’m still calming down from having to do battle with this Lemmy user, but I plan on keep adding the license to my comments, as at this point it just feels like the right thing to do.
I might change the wording though to how you worded it, seems more intuitive for people to understand, than listing the actual Creative Commons license code/name.
Just block the negative people and move on 🤷 The license text ain’t hurting nobody and anybody triggered enough to insult or mock you about it ain’t worth reading anyway.
I agree, but I’ve been told they’re very obnoxious, and I’m a fool to believe in them, and get a lot of harsh language and arguments about using it.
I keep having to remind people it’s just a link in a comment, but it really triggers some people for some reason.
Nice, somebody else is licensing their comments! 🙌
Have you taken a lot of crap over doing so? The last three days for me have been kind of rough. 😋
They’re a user around here that has the username onlinepersona [And something else I think], they’ve been doing the same thing since…before the reddit exodus I think, so that’s probably who you picked it up from
Now that I think about it I don’t think I’ve seen him in awhile now
@onlinepersona@programming.dev was last online just a few hours ago.
And they are using the same license, so it might be that I did get the idea from him/her. I honestly don’t remember.
It’s displayed weird for me
https://lemmy.world/comment/9699276
https://lemmy.world/comment/9739694
TL;DR: it displays fine on the web client, so get the devs to fix your app, or use the web client.
Edit: Added a second link that has an actual example of both regular, super, and subscript fonts being used, as well as a link to Lemmy World’s help page on formatting comments.
From the article…
Should all go according to plan, Nokia’s 4G/LTE lunar network would provide more bandwidth than the traditional ultra-high frequency (UHF) systems used for space communication. It would not only make communications quicker from astronaut to astronaut, but also for autonomous robotic systems on the moon. Plus, the network could eventually be adapted for Mars — and upgraded to 5G one day.
I don’t know why, but I find it strangely funny that it’s only going to be 4G, and not 5G.
Regardless of the ranges issue of 4G versus 5G, I’m assuming that signal repeaters will be necessary for both of the protocols.
Are you an alt of that online persona guy, or is this just starting to spread lmao
I don’t know who the ‘online persona guy’ is, but I did see someone else doing this, so I decided to mimic it, as I thought it was a great idea.
You’re welcome. I appreciate you helping out with normalizing signature lines.
Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)