It hasnt gone anywhere because it wont pass. Do you doubt that democrats would pass this if they could and get more voters?
It hasnt gone anywhere because it wont pass. Do you doubt that democrats would pass this if they could and get more voters?
I used correlate very intentionally because that is literally what it is. It is textbook the definition of correlation.
Higher education does not equal better voter. Life experience and having a mind that works well is the best way to get a better voter. And I would be one of the people that realizes that our current voting system doesnt work and we get to many voters that dont know what they are voting for. So maybe a test would be in order to vote, or some other thing.
Sorry man but you are wrong. It was a couple years ago, but they had an actual vote on this and about half of house democrats voted to lower the age, and virtually no republicans did. Democrats would like to lower the age because they would get more votes. I can look it up if you wish, but its a thing they want.
I CORRELATE age with knowing what is going and being deceived less. So now see above question.
If conservatives are the ones that dont want educated voters, why do the democrats directly seek to get younger people to vote and even want to lower the voting age?
Its different in that they actually have to take effort to vote so that would tend toward more educated voters and ones that actually care and are not just swayed for a moment while laying in bed.
How would that not just make them vote due to whatever bullshit commercial they saw the day before?
Oh I dont know, I would just assume they could update (or retrain) to adapt pretty quickly.
AI probably was already patched 5 minutes after the article came out.
If it actually does entail owning and viewing porn then the quote should match the claim. The document is like 1000 pages, if its in there then it needs to be quoted in the graphic.
If someone says “homosexuality is unnatural” it would be in reference to what they see as the natural state of humanity and not at all related to animals. Relating animals to the conversation is just dumb, it has nothing to do with anything. You can disagree with them, but animal behavior proves nothing.
They dont know what they are saying.
Animals frequently murder those other than themselves, so then is what could be considered bigotry also natural? If this is all natural then what is the whole point of calling things natural?
So if I do anything and animal does then its totally cool?
So when a human rapes or murders and eats another human that is natural becuase animals do this?
Or maybe animals and humans are not the same and we dont get to pick and chose for memes…
So then if animals do it then its the same as humans doing it?
Are we pretending that humans and animals do the same things? You can be fine with homosexuality, but what animals do have nothing to do with what humans do.
How do you know? How many good and bad wars has the US been involved in the last 100 years?
I think this is a chicken and egg situation, the more government the more it will morph into something bad for a portion of the people.
They voted on it in the house, and for democrats it was 125 for and 108 against, and 1 republican voting for it. So yes a majority of house democrats voted for it.