It’s probably because I generally saw the sub shutdowns as a result of the protest, and not as an ongoing protest. Reddit clearly wasn’t in any talks with the mods at that point and vica versa.
Honestly i’ll just go with it being months. I’m basically just arguing semantics at this point.
I mean, I remember it being weeks myself.
But it’s not as if things went back to the way they were either. There were definitely effects due to those weeks.
On the bright side, it looks (based on what I can tell) that things calmed down and the guy he was talking to took it fairly well.
Was strict the default? I’d assume the standard would be the default.
I’d imagine if you were using strict you want the sites to break because you absolutely do not want fingerprinting. That kindof restriction usually comes with the breaking being expected.
Uhhh…that’s not a meme, as the other guy said it’s virtue signalling. I don’t even know why you would fallback on it being a meme since people generally agreed with what you said.
If anything I think that makes you sound like an ass but that’s just me.
I mean yeah, but Spez we know for a fact actually did something.
Meanwhile someone will be eating gummies to cure themselves of some modern disease instead of using actual science-proven medication.
Okay
But in this entire discussion we haven’t even tied him or his homophobia to the feature change this article is discussing.
I mean, it’s more like I wanted to see more discussion about brave. It’s not even like it’s talking about things the CEO specifically did to the browser, it’s just talking about the CEO.
And yeah I’m complaining about different threads in a post, when 3 comments are about the browser and like 15 are about the CEO.
If you have something to say negative about brave from this feature, that’s cool, but I’m not seeing it.
I’m…honestly surprised you can be on lemmy when you damn products over singular people. Just cause I know there’s people who have tried to dissuade others from lemmy over the developers. And in that case the people involved are even closer to the code than a CEO would be.
I mean it’s derailed the entire thread so pretty much nobody is talking about the removed feature anymore.
Wait why are you on the privacy community when you don’t care about the parts that are specifically related to privacy?
I mean, you can grandstand all you want while you have no platforms to safely do it on. Pretty sure having working products for privacy is more important to activism than one guy being an asshole.
So basically they’re protecting you from something that’s only possible, because of something they shouldn’t have done.
Ahhh…you’re trying to play Windows 3.1 games…that’s why you’re having issues…yeah emulation for Windows 3.1’s random differences from Windows 95 and DOS are surprisingly rare still.
There’s no dedicated emulator for Windows 3.1 yet. I personally installed a copy onto Doxbox, but it’s not a very easy solution.
But I can tell it’s 3.1 cause one of those is The Learning Company and the later versions of the Super Solver games have the same issues.
That’s not moving goalposts, you’re just arguing semantics. People generally think of eliminate when they say prevent in this kind of conversation…
If anything if they went “prevention” and not “eliminate” like in your sense…it would be even dumber because it would just make the steamdeck a more restrictive x86-processor computer compared to the systems people were already comparing it to up until it’s release
Imagine how it would’ve gone down if people were saying “Of course you can do that, it’s a PC” if people responded with “Yeah, except it’s 10x harder to do things you could normally do on PC”. They wanted it to be close to how a PC is, it was part of the advertising campaign.
And if you’re going to flaunt your title you should probably actually…you know…say something that pertains to that knowledge you have.
This just seems like blind fanboyism. As great as the steamdeck is there’s no reason to act like it’s doing things it’s not actually doing. It was designed the way it was because it had to be, there doesn’t need to be anything whimsical about it.
The…arm-based systems that use a different kind of BIOS?
If even Apple isn’t doing it on x86, I don’t see why Valve would start.
…?
No they couldn’t, it’s fucking Linux. They’d have to tie the controller drivers hostage to “lock it down”, and at that point they’d hit so many hiccups with legitimate users.
Like they’d have to pull so many things from Linux (in particular Proton) to “DRM-ify” the steamdeck.
And as I think someone else just posted, some of the stuff they’d need to lock-down aren’t even things Valve has control over. Like I said Proton but Valve doesn’t own proton.
To be fair, only a handful of publishers were able to take their cards and go elsewhere. The media companies were a lot more on top of dragging their products off of Netflix.
Nobody would be on steam just for Valve games, after all, and indie has a much lower barrier of entry.
While they could certainly distribute their current products better, a lot of the issues they have now (see: belated frogs comment) aren’t things they really had control over.