• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    thats fair. suppose we must push harder for remote work, its way better to the environment and much everytging else anyway.

    • Universal Monk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      suppose we must push harder for remote work

      But most remote work pays enough that housing isn’t an issue. Many lower paying jobs require us to be on-site, and we’re the ones that can’t afford housing.

      So I think the option is way more affordable housing, and removing the stigma around that. In my area it’s called Section 8, and of course, those options always seem to be in the more crime-ridden areas. So frustrating.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        a) you can suddenly make housing more affordable by freeing up tons of office space and keeping it like that until investors start losing money.

        b) jobs that can be remote doesnt always pay enough for housing. even computer science jobs here can sometimes be paying 200-300$/mo, but you can think of telemarketing too.

        • Universal Monk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Good points! I should have remembered telemarketing, I actually did that for 3 years! But two years in office, covid let us do it from home.