• dneaves@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haskell for sure has a very sloped learning curve. The functional style, different syntax, a myriad of symbols and pragmas, as well as the tooling around it.

    The only reason I was able to pick it up as quick as I did was because I was used to Elm due to my job. Then it was just learning about the IO type (and how to use it), cabal, stack, built-in symbols, and the most common pragmas.

    But the symbols part is especially harsh, since symbols only hold meaning if they’re universally understood. Sure, the base- language ones are kinda adopted at this point, so they’ll stay, but the fact that external modules can also make symbols (sometimes without actually-named counterparts) adds some confusion. Like, would you just know what .: is supposed to mean off the top of your head?

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like, would you just know what .: is supposed to mean off the top of your head?

      Yeah, it’s point-free shenanigans people use for code-golf and satisfying the linter.

      If you caught yourself using it, you should probably reevaluate.