• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok. How many times has landing a probe on Mars failed? Because I can think of at least 3. Saying “this one succeeded” doesn’t really change the point.

    • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually it does, since much of the success attained, is a direct result of what was learned from previous launches.

      It’s part of an iterative process called “learning from past mistakes”.

      If it’s any consolation, I doubt that you’d qualify for any space mission, so you’ll be quite safe from space travel related harm.

        • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not grasping how flying a helicopter on Mars takes the same sort of technology, software and control as landing a probe on Mars. But feel free to explain why they’re the same.

          Are you really unable to talk to me without being needlessly rude?

          Are you?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What? Asking you to explain something is rude? I am legitimately confused as to why you think that’s rude.

            • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              But feel free to explain why they’re the same.

              This is you being rude and condescending, because you think I was claiming that flying the helicopter on Mars was somehow technologically equivalent to an entire launching of a probe.

              You telling me to “feel free to explain” is based entirely on you thinking that you’re dunking on me. Since that isn’t my arguement, you aren’t.

              You’re not legitimately confused about it either.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry, that’s just not true. You’re making all sorts of assumptions which are false. I honestly wanted an explanation.

                • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining.

                  You thought (incorrectly) that I was arguing that the helicopter probe by itself was as technologically impressive as the entire mission that delivered it.

                  That’s why you used the “feel free to explain” verbiage.