I would much prefer this piece of shit die in obscurity, thanks

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Expecting free software is the problem. Software development isn’t free from time or effort.

      • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Permanent ad free for boost is less than a cup of coffee in a Starbucks… The dev deserves to be paid for their time (especially as a Lemmy app actually requires maintenance for updates to Lemmy).

        Sure hate on shovelware games or games with 15 DLC’s that should have been part of the base game… But don’t hate on proper apps like boost.

        • remotelove@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t hate on it and do not advocate for or against it. You do you. Boost is simply one of many options and other options may be free and ad-less.

          Because of the nature of ad platforms and ad delivery, various metrics about your activity is also sent to third parties. It’s something to be aware of, at least.

          I am saying that if an app is good enough, I’ll donate or buy it. For now, I am a top contributor to Connect. Yay? Personally, I think the ad route is trashy, but others don’t seem to mind unless they get blasted in the face by Troof Social.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s true that development takes skill, time, and effort, but there are many rewards which are not monetary.

      I don’t “expect” a dev to put themselves into poverty maintaining an app that I feel like I deserve. But if there are apps maintained by devs as a hobby or whatever and are opensource then naturally those will be my preference.