Will it be able to compete at all costs wise, given its lack of reusability?

BBC mentioned it would probably be a decade before the ESA reaches that sort of technology.

Sorry for dumb question I haven’t been following space stuff at all. But I read a couple articles on yesterdays launch and was interested.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Having the strategic capabilities to access space without having to rely on a far-right billionaire who is a big supporter of the person commiting genocide in Ukraine right now.

  • plactagonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Niche of political points.

    It is mainly “we can do it too” project now. There are lots of subcontractors, jobs and research put in to it but it won’t be price competitive any time soon. It is similar to SLS programe.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I suspect, for very large constellation projects or similar, which would be adversely affected by a launch provider abruptly stopping launches for any reason, they might want to buy a few launches for redundancy purposes – just risk mitigation.

      I mean operators that aren’t Starlink, in this case.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think the only niche will be stubborn European governments.

    • mecfs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean in any case it’s good to have a backup to not have to rely on someone as uhh… unfavourable and unpredictable as Musk, but that’s disappointing to hear.

      • mercano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, unfortunately, SpaceX is streets ahead of anyone else in the launch industry in terms of reusability and, in turn, price. In a purely capitalistic system, they’d be putting everyone else out of business, but the US government wants a second source vendor, so ULA stays around, and foreign governments want independent access to space, for a combination of national security and pride, so the Russian, Chinese, Indian, and European space agencies keep on trucking.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I suspect in 10 years or so that’ll change. There are lots of new space companies, it just takes a long time to build a new rocket.