• BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lawns:

    1. require artificial irrigation that contributes to depletion ofvaquifers

    2. create monocultures that reduce biodiversity and harm ecosystems

    3. require maintenance that usually involves burning fossil fuels

    4. shadeless lawns contribute to warmer neighborhoods

    5. act as nitrogen sinks

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not a fan of lawns but I have a huge lawn that does none of these things and looks fine. I don’t irrigate and my lawn is greener than the neighbors. I let anything grow and cut it long with an electric mower. Plenty of shade /w 20+ oaks covering the whole property. No idea about nitrogen, but I don’t fertilize, everything that drops from trees gets mulched back into the lawn which keeps everything healthy. At least there are ways to avoid these things if you care.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago
      1. Not necessarily
      2. Not necessarily
      3. Not necessarily
      4. So?
      5. Okay

      But there are benefits too like useable play areas, and with well maintained lawns you have a lower risk of issues like ticks etc.

      I realise where I am making this argument but I just came across this and didnt realise people hated lawns.