• Colin@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    @Wilshire
    I have serious doubts that NASA will ever land anybody on Mars. Not because of hardware challenges, but because of the difficulty of getting anything biological there alive.

    • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah but we should do those things - Not because they are easy, but because they are hardtm

        • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I imagine that medicine or treatments to repair DNA damage from cosmic rays will also help with cancer. Or optimized ways to produce tasty and protein rich food could really help with small scale circular economies on earth. Although the real issue might be toxic perchlorate on mars.

        • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          maybe a reason is using that money to give people Healthcare and free education. You know, like, things that actually matter. Why do we need to go to mars?

          • Colin@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            @platypus_plumba
            The US will never establish any form of ‘free’ or inexpensive healthcare. US politicians are ideologically opposed to the idea. The US ranks at number 37 in the world in English and Maths achievement, and their politicians don’t care.