Giant black holes were supposed to be bit players in the early cosmic story. But recent James Webb Space Telescope observations are finding an unexpected abundance of the beasts.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The things we see are from a millions years ago, who knows where or how big these are right now, might not even exist any more.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        *Billions (13,000+ million). Based on our current understanding and their close proximity to each other in the early universe, most of them would have likely merged and many/most may be now at a size where it would take a google years to evaporate. The extremely small ones that did not merge may have already evaporated.

        Source: Hawking radiation

        • chimerical@toast.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          From my understanding they would still have a looong way to go before they would have evaporated.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I thought so too but apparently the length of time it takes a black hole to evaporate is based on mass and those with a low mass — as in, the mass of the moon — should have already evaporated. Only supermassive black holes are the ones likely to take a google years to evaporate.

            Edit: none of the ones pictured are that small. We probably couldn’t detect them for hundreds/thousands of years (e.g. until solar system sized telescopes).