• MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    At least for Bitcoin it made some level of sense.

    With AI?

    If it really gets that good that everyone needs to use it, I can just ask AI how to use AI like a pro.

    Or I can just tell AI to use AI for me (isn’t that what OpenClaw is?)

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      Bitcoin makes sense when the government prints 40% more currency and inflates assets, like Covid.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah it takes 0 skill. People thinking they’re Paul Allen because they typed a prompt is humorous. Its often the types who have absolutely no clue how computers work that are obsessed with llm slop.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If it really gets that good that everyone needs to use it, I can just ask AI how to use AI like a pro.

      As a pro who is forced to use AI, I did this a lot when I was learning how to use it.

      Or I can just tell AI to use AI for me

      Yep. Subagents are a very normal part of AI tools

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Misread the title as “being left handed”, came into the comments to make a “Well, that’s just sinister!” joke and was highly confused by the comments - and the article - until I noticed my mistake. lol

  • ChromaticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If this tech is as amazing as you say it is, I’ll be able to pick it up and become productive on a timescale of my choosing not yours.

    While I agree, my boss sadly thinks otherwise.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    For every HTML 2.0 you might have tried, you were just as likely to have got stuck in the dead-end of Flash.

    This one hurt. I had a decade plus old piece of tech debt from when they fucking killed flash before I could move on to new projects.

    • Redkey@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      I sympathize with the point of the article, but if someone’s seriously citing Flash, which had widespread success for a run of about 15 years before being overtaken by later developments (driven in part by a billionaire with an axe to grind), as a short-lived “dead end” that was best avoided, then how long do they think is a sensible amount of time to wait to see if something’s worth spending time and effort? Nothing remains on top forever.

    • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Flash had its use. I think a better analogy for me is web frameworks.

      I remember in the mid 2000s there seems to be a new one every week. “LOL, you aren’t using Ruby On Rails? Peasant!” “LOL, you aren’t using Django? Peasant!”

      Still seems to be the case with Electron, React, Node, blah blah blah.

      Running to stand still.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        “LOL, you aren’t using Django? Peasant!”

        … I’m working on learning Django to get a job… should I stop? What should I use instead?

        My webserver I’ve had for a while supports basically that.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I’m the wrong person to ask. My goto language is older than I am and hasn’t had a meaningful change since I was born.

            • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              C.

              I exaggerate a bit. C99 lets you declare variables anywhere inside the block, not just the top.

              Which still got me into an argument with a coworker who wanted me to declare every variable at the top of the block “in case” we port the code to a compiler that doesn’t support it.

              C99 was 20 years old at that point.

              Newer versions of C have generics “support” but I haven’t seen it in the wild yet.

            • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Fortran has a 2018 release. Assembly is tied to the cpu, so I assume it changes every iteration.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Django isn’t going anywhere. The point is not to jump on the latest fad, which Django isn’t.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I feel like the web framework question has stabilized in recent years. React and node (not a web framework but in a similar boat) are stable and common, and angular and a few others are good alternatives.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Articulates the conclusion I’ve come to.

    The idea that fetuses today will never catch up to a technology touted as easy enough for a dog to use is absurd.

    If this stuff is so amazing, then I’ll pick it up when it matures.

    It frankly doesn’t solve any problems I have. PR approvals are my bottleneck, not writing code.

    And as more people outsource their thinking to LLMs, the less intelligent they are on their own.

    Hope you have enough tokens and the server isn’t 404.