• solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Tldr the race is with China. We sound likely to lose a bunch of planetary exploration to send humans back to the moon where they already went 55 years ago, to make a symbolic point.

  • ptfrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I feel compelled to comment here (a Lemmy forum centred around itjust.works?) about another comment (on a Zenforo forum centred around arstechnica.com?) about another comment (on a Disqus forum centred around thespacereview.com?) about the ICPS.

    for Arty 3, SLS doesn’t need to launch with an ICPS at all: it’s perfectly capable of getting an Orion to LEO using only the core and SRBs. … This requires that somebody (likely Teledyne-Brown) manufacture an adapter … If they can get this done in a bit more than a year, Arty 3 could be ready to go in 4Q2027. That then leaves the ICPS that was meant for Arty 3 available for Arty 4, which should be the Moon landing.

    I wonder whether this is a good idea, and how likely it is that NASA would have already considered it.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Again? I suppose when your empire is creatively bankrupt and too actually bankrupt to go to Mars you gotta find some way to steal money and put it in Elon’s wallet.