Discussion of the current situation with the Blåhaj instances, and upcoming maintenance.

  • audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love that people in the comments here are like “have you tried” and “maybe we could”…as if I expected a server full of trans folks to NOT have a bunch of techie people on it :)

  • 𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚@yah.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A few friendly recommendations that may help:

    1. Remove the AWS load balancer. Your web application isn’t horizontally scaled so you don’t need that extra cost. Obviously you’ll still have to pay for bandwidth moving all those images but you remove the ELB hourly usage cost from the equation. If you’re using it for a reverse proxy, simply install a nginx container on the lemmy box. If really want a load balancer, you’ll save money by hosting haproxy on a regular server.

    2. Get off Amazon RDS. You’ll save money by hosting your database on a regular server than using RDS. You’re moving from a fully managed solution to one you have to manage your own. This means managing your own backups and replication if you want HA failover.

    3. Switch to object storage for pictrs. The cost is much lower.

    However, you’re right that Amazon prices are high and you’ll likely find cheaper alternatives elsewhere.

    • SomeRandomWords@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not sure I agree with moving from managed to unmanaged for RDS, unless you’re very familiar with databases and keeping them online, RDS (and other managed DB providers) are honestly one of the places I recommend spending more on.

      The rest of your points are spot on though.

      • 𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚@yah.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh yeah, I agree it’s not the right choice for everyone. There’s a whole lot that can go wrong self managing DBs. Also, you’re losing out on availability as RDS gives you two availability zones for redundancy. It’s a trade off I think based on your experience, budget, and uptime requirements. Just spit balling, but I believe it would be something like a 20% cost reduction for the db hosting.

  • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I used to work for Akamai for quite a while, so I’ve got a lot of experience in the CDN sphere. Let me know if you’d like guidance or assistance in coming up with cheaper solutions for handling the heavy lifting of your CDN needs, especially for highly-cachable content.

  • Moss's alt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you wish, I can try to migrate 196 to a different instance. That would most probably reduce the load considerably

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      While your offer clearly comes from a place of compassion, I don’t think that’s what the admins are asking for. They stated elsewhere in the thread that the main point of their post was to inform about the downtime and why.

      I think if you wanted to do something to make a difference, maybe you could put the ko-fi link in the sidebar of 196 and ask people to contribute if they’re able.

  • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    That’s interesting to know the price per user is averaging 50¢ per month, I wonder what other instances like beeaw, lemmy.world, etc. are at?

    Either way, I hope more people donate to help keep costs manageable, especially reoccurring donations.

    Also, thank you so much for the work you’ve done and continue to do with this, there’s no where else in the fediverse I’d rather be than here!

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Most people aren’t running on AWS, and once we move off of it, our costs will come way down. We’re just seeing the reality of a tiny instance for a few people that grew rapidly in a way we didn’t see coming. We didn’t implement things initially with this scale in mind :)

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Out of curiosity, what are most people using currently? I’ve been really interested in getting involved with the tech behind Lemmy and how to improve it for instance admins.

      • Shit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s crazy is there a breakdown of the bandwidth? Like is it federation, images or ddos using so much bandwidth?

        I know you are looking/found a solution but if the main culprit is images would it be possible to offload it to a few servers? I feel like running multiple image server instances would be cheaper for bandwidth. Oracle cloud offers 10tb outbound a month for free per region/month on the free teir. Or is an unmetered host viable? From my understanding Lemmy is pretty light in terms of CPU/memory or does that fall apart at scale?

        If you don’t mind and it’s not too much trouble would you be willing to share stuff like load average/disk use?

        Edit I looked this over again. Not an endorsement for giving oracle or Larry Ellison money, they are awful. I was just was trying to say the free stuff is generous. You can use 40tb outbound without paying on the free resources. As always aggressive support for you Ada! Thanks for the transparency in your community!

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s most images from lemmy. We’ve set up a caching server for pictrs, and that has got the bandwidth part under control.

          Next step, get everything else off of AWS :)

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It seems like the images are playing a big role so perhaps having images being offloaded to another service (like catbox.moe) or converting images to WebP with a healthy amount of compression would help.

    Basically decrease the amount of storage you folks are having to pay for.

    Or auto delete pictures after a week or 2 and add a disclaimer about it to when pictures are being uploaded.

    Maybe also a file size limit. Nothing over 10MB or whatever.

    I hope this whole thing can be sorted out I dig this instance.