The whole channel should have way more views. Science fraud is a topic that scientists knows and talk about but it is always vague and it’s hard to point at precises cases due to lack of documentation (and journalists in general).
The whole channel should have way more views. Science fraud is a topic that scientists knows and talk about but it is always vague and it’s hard to point at precises cases due to lack of documentation (and journalists in general).
That is not how it works. You are the one posting dubious claims, it is your own job to back up those claims with actual evidence.
I’m losing faith of this community. It’s like far right people deniing reality and pushing weird agenda like: red eye in thumbnail so it must be wrong.
All the points that have read here aren’t addressing the content but weird stuff.
Maybe https://retractionwatch.com/2023/10/02/nobel-prize-winner-gregg-semenza-tallies-tenth-retraction/ is also wrong for you and all the rest of the world. I’m not gonna take time to answer toxic people like you who are not even trying…
It was my mistake to post this here. I take full responsibility and will not interact any more as I can see how reddit-like lemmy has become since the rise of lemmy.world. You can just ignore me or keep spitting your venom with 0 argument.