• cgtjsiwy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Regular expressions are great and can always be matched in linear time with respect to the input string length.

    The problem is that JS standard library RegExps aren’t actually regular expressions, but rather a much broader language, which is impossible to implement efficiently. If RegExp switched to proper regular expressions, they would match much faster but supporting backreferences like /(.*)x\1/ would be impossible.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you insist on the definition as it is in formal language theory.

      In practice regex is widely used to mean the pattern matching thing that also supports back references.

      Wikipedia suggests using the term “regular expressions” for the language theory thing and “regex” for the programming language (PCRE) thing. I agree and would even go further and say that any time one wants to refer to the concept as it is used in formal language theory they should explicitly specify that they are talking about the theoretical concept, not the regex implementation as it is found in most programming languages.