

You should make one using AI, on every page load it generates a random image and has the caption of something completely different
AI wars
🇺🇦Donate to help volunteer fighters defend Ukraine! https://protectavolunteer.com/ 🇺🇦
🌲Help plant tree’s, remove carbon, protect rainforest and more!
ikt has funded planting of 1,142 trees and the prevention of 53.74 tCO2e from being emitted
You should make one using AI, on every page load it generates a random image and has the caption of something completely different
AI wars
yep the biggest worry isn’t AI, it’s India
https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/india-co2-emissions/
The west is lowering its co2 output while India is slurping up all the co2 we’re saving:
This doesn’t include China of course, the most egregious of the co2 emitters
AI is not even a tiny blip on that radar, especially as AI is in data centres and devices which runs on electricity so the more your country goes to renewables the less co2 impacting it is over time
we’re rolling out renewables at like 100x the rate of ai electricity use, so no need to worry there
what models are going nuts?
i don’t really give a shit why he’s donating and i don’t know why you attach yourself to conspiracy theories like a trump supporter, he’s donating, he’s helping, that’s all i need to know:
Before the Gates efforts on malaria, malaria drugmakers had largely given up on producing drugs to fight the disease, and the foundation is the world’s largest donor to research on diseases of the poor.[139]
With the help of Gates-funded vaccination drives, deaths from measles in Africa have dropped by 90 percent since 2000.[140]
The foundation has donated billions of dollars to help sufferers of AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, protecting millions of children from death at the hands of preventable diseases.[140]
what’s to be fooled with? i appreciate that he donates and advocates to help people with his money
there are plenty of other billionaires you’ll never hear of and they’ll never have to hear you complain because they don’t step into the limelight at all and just horde their money instead
Good guy bill, saw him also giving shit to Musk as well recently
Bill Gates accused Elon Musk of killing poor children as he announced Thursday that he would donate his remaining fortune to his charity
What a turn around from the 90’s
Probably best asking this in https://discuss.online/c/localllama@sh.itjust.works
So she and the rest of her squishy latte liberal cohort threw away a big chunk of LGBTQ support for what? What did Dems gain by embracing reactionary policy?
Why are you asking what the dems gained? You’re the one now worse off?
What did you gain by not voting for her?
I don’t get it, can you explain it more? I’m not talking about the voting system, I’m talking about the culture:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesser_of_two_evils_principle#In_modern_elections
In 2012, Huffington Post columnist Sanford Jay Rosen stated that refusal to vote for the lesser of two evils became common practice for left-leaning voters in the United States due to their overwhelming disapproval of the United States government’s support for the Vietnam War.[8] Rosen stated: “Beginning with the 1968 presidential election, I often have heard from liberals that they could not vote for the lesser of two evils. Some said they would not vote; some said they would vote for a third-party candidate. That mantra delivered us to Richard Nixon in 1972 until Watergate did him in. And it delivered us to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in 2000 until they were termed out in 2009”.[8]
She can add it delivered Trump 2024 as well to that list
Australian doesn’t have first past the post voting! What are you talking about!
I don’t get it, how does this preclude having shit options to vote for?
Yes, it’s possible to have 2 shit candidates you know :P
In Australia we are frequently voting for the ‘least worst’ candidate, we have mandatory voting so very few of us have this idea in our head that we need to run out and enthusiastically support a candidate, we just vote for the one who we think will do the least damage, in Australia Kamala would have won easily
do you think aoc would have won as well?
i agree with you but the guy i was arguing with claimed that kamala strayed too far from left wing values and thats why she didn’t win
my claim is something more fundamental, she didn’t assure voters that she would do better on the economy than trump
imo even if she did turn around and become the biggest pro Palestinian, transgender, anarchist, radical communist out there she still wouldn’t have won because the biggest issue to people was the local economy not gaza
she probably should have just offered everyone a tax cut
edit: and that trump has pretty much no values or ideals, just donald is #1 and he’s gonna fix everything and everyone else is wrong or stupid
But this is about ideals and values of the left wing vs right.
What values and ideals does Trump have that appeals to them?
Six Trump voters on why he won their support in 2024 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyg5jdgzy1o
Lets see these “ideals” and “values” that Trump voters hold dear to their hearts:
They don’t like immigrants, the border crossings
They thought he could do a better job with the economy
They thought he could do a better job with the economy
‘With his grandkids, I see the softer side’ <- Lady is on drugs I assume, going to ignore this one
They thought he could do a better job with the economy
Doesn’t like war, likes a strong man leader
So 3 out of 5 were about the economy 1 didn’t like illegal immigration 1 didn’t like war
So people voted largely for Trump because they felt the economy does better under him
And this looks to be backed up with this poll:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/651719/economy-important-issue-2024-presidential-vote.aspx
Economy Most Important Issue to 2024 Presidential Vote
The economy ranks as the most important of 22 issues that U.S. registered voters say will influence their choice for president. It is the only issue on which a majority of voters, 52%, say the candidates’ positions on it are an “extremely important” influence on their vote. Another 38% of voters rate the economy as “very important,” which means the issue could be a significant factor to nine in 10 voters.
Is this a conservative value? a good economy? do leftists not value a good economy?
Compromise on all your ideals and field the most mediocre candidate
If Kamala is mediocre what does that make Trump?
Secondly what is it about Trump that most strikes him as a conservative? What conservative values do you think he thinks about and values the most?
when you say limit to 100 sended emails, do you have a limit of like 100 within 24 hours or 1 hour or something like this?
Removed by mod
mullvad
do it