Sorry for the clickbait title but I thought a great video from a great but not well known channel.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It depends on how you measure efficiency. In terms of labor input, yes. In terms of food produced per area of land, smaller farms are actually far more efficient. So it’s not quite that simple.

    Not sure if you watched the video but it goes into this topic a bit so if not it could be informative.

    But yes home gardens have lots of benefits that go beyond carbon emissions. And since we have direct control of them, it may be easier to reduce those emissions than those from some distant farm.

    • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This probably depends a lot on the gardening method. Like, your average gardener with no strategy is probably carbon positive. Ok, but what about biointensive gardening? What about permaculture gardening? What about guerilla gardening? What about aquaponics?

      If you’re driving to the garden store to get fertilizer, then you’re probably carbon positive. If you’re composting yourself and building your soil, I don’t know.

      Edit: looks like it’s covered in the video. Will follow up later.

      Edit: watched the video. Yes, basically permaculture is way less carbon intensive. The carbon comes from infrastructure (raised beds, sheds, etc).