You understand the list of things China did was a response to the insane comment that most of the bad things we heard of were made up. Do you think they’re made up? If not, then you most likely don’t have anything meaningful to say about the topic at hand.
You seem to have a deep-seated conviction that the information about China is anywhere from false to deeply exaggerated. Do you have any evidence of that, or are you just assuming that everything is an incredibly successful disinformation campaign staged by the US state department and using that as the foundation for all your assumptions?
You understand the list of things China did was a response to the insane comment that most of the bad things we heard of were made up. Do you think they’re made up? If not, then you most likely don’t have anything meaningful to say about the topic at hand.
Exaggerated and embellished to the point of absurdity in order provoke a Red Scare and justify a new war.
You’re buying the same lies that lead us into Iraq.
You think China doesn’t have nukes?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
You seem to have a deep-seated conviction that the information about China is anywhere from false to deeply exaggerated. Do you have any evidence of that, or are you just assuming that everything is an incredibly successful disinformation campaign staged by the US state department and using that as the foundation for all your assumptions?
Due to an abundance of prior evidence.
This study concludes that, as was the case in previous iterations of Orientalism, the West continues to claim an exclusive right to produce knowledge about China, often without externally validating its own evidence or entertaining contradictory information from the Orient.
So there is no specific evidence, then. Just assumptions.
I linked you to the evidence
A study demonstrating the existence and success of past information campaigns? Are you making a joke?