I was around at the time, too, but young and still liked to think the best of people.

I’ve clicked a few. Mostly by accident, the rest by deception.

Add I understand it, the real meaning of that line is not exactly what it sounds like. It meant something like “in this anonymous place, only your thoughts matter, not your identity.” If an idea was good, it was good, and it didn’t matter who had the idea. Very egalitarian.

Of course, we have since realized that isn’t really true. Sometimes it’s important to know if a thought is coming from a woman, who has had different experience from a man.

Still an idea that need to be left behind, but not the one you probably think.

That’s what Eternal September means.

“Pics or it didn’t happen” doesn’t really work anymore.

We can’t tell if it’s pointlessly gendered unless wet know what the questions are about. Seems likely to be a study of some kind, and knowing how men perceive other men, for example, might be valuable data.

Always has. Always will. (for a given value of “right.”)

Civilization is an effort to be better than that. Occasionally, we succeed.

The positive side effects are usually just the effects.

Comes from all the nonsense I talk.

Look, I know I’m wrong. But I like it that way. Jog on.

I don’t think 29 year olds are millennial, are they? Or is this an older meme?

Indeed it is so.

Nevertheless, assholes.

If the employers are using computers to read my resume, why shouldn’t I used a computer to write it?

Assholes to the lot of them.

Disagree. The DM should provide some sort of reason for the party to come together. Some sort of external influence, to bring in any characters that don’t start the game together.

But it is the duty of the player to roll with it. Don’t fight the plot hook. What’s the point?

If you were to use their network to take advantage of the features for anything that the “predator” behind doesn’t care, you’re fine.

But what will the predator care about tomorrow? Or next year? And how confident are you that aggregate data is not what they want, for whatever reason?

Removed by mod

My loyalty is for sale.

Scientists were so caught up with weather they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.

That would be a planet-eating star, OR a star eating a planet.

Shouldn’t journalists be able to construct sentences?

Ah, I see. You are thinking about the properly structured flowchart, not the humorously true one.

Yea, fair enough.