100

We need to make it clear that people who didn’t vote, who let Trump kill millions of Palestinians, Ukrainians, and trans people, aren’t leftists. They’re genocide supporters. Genocide supporters get no sympathy for any of the mental gymnastics they use to justify it.

They went to the polls and the Republicans threw out their votes.

GoT set up Daenerys going insane in book 1. It was so obvious. I don’t know about the TV show, but it’s clear as day in the first book.

As for joker? It’s set up in the cartoon at the beginning. They literally tell you how the movie is going to go in that animation.

I think a story about an evil man who suddenly went sane is really interesting

They’re also used to describe some enbies

You think the DNC leadership chooses the president? I thought it was the voters who choose the president. The voters who “pulled the trigger”. That’s why I’m saying you’re complicit. Because you pulled the trigger, and I don’t think you voted for Harris, given how little you care for Palestinian lives.

Yeah, I’m saying you’re not actively and effectively genocidal like Donald Trump, you’re just dumb and complicit, like Joe Biden.

Four more paragraphs and you still don’t care how many Gazans die.

Nice six paragraph comment. I skimmed it. Looks like none of it addresses the fact that a Trump presidency is in the process of killing millions of innocent people. I guess you just don’t think the lives of minorities are important.

I know, right? It’s especially bad with the people I personally disagree with

What kind of mental failing do you suffer from, that millions of Palestinian, Ukrainian, and transgender lives are nothing to you?

There you go. You’re stating your own opinion instead of following capitalism’s laws like a sheep. I’m happy now.

I think Fallout London adds more to the game and was wanted by more people. Democracy and utility seem to be agreed on this case, and those are the two measures I use to determine importance.

No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.

Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.

Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?

I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned

I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.