Evilsandwichman [none/use name]

Or make every living thing deeply aware of each of their atoms at all times

Nah, I want to give it a little mouth; the little squeaking screams are cute

Fuzzy wuzzy little misery squishy

even if though the foreign state has never contemplated this potential advantage

So any time your imagination runs away with you, you need to treat others as your enemies?

NIMH IS REAL!?

Ironically yes it was!

Ah, good; honestly I remember taking rogue before this change was made (or perhaps it had been changed at that point but none of us at the table knew) and the problem was immediately evident; there’s a lot of stuff in 5e that makes me wonder what the heck the creators were thinking and if perhaps they just rushed the whole thing along and decided to just fix up any oversight later.

This is basically 5e sneak attack anyway (the ‘not having it’ aspect that is)

You can only get a sneak attack if you have advantage on an enemy, and you know what? You don’t have advantage on an enemy just cause you’re flanking them, that’s mentioned in the book as an optional rule the DM can allow (where flanking gives advantage) but isn’t the usual rule. In 3e/3.5e/PF, an enemy being flanked confers benefits including allowing sneak attacks. In 5e the only way to sneak attack without needing advantage is by taking the swashbuckler (specialization? Archetype?).

overqwil

Yeah overkill would be a terrible name for meds; this would be the easiest one

Yeah that title terrified me for a solid minute there

bread poisoning

Oof, I remember someone once sticking a piece of bread in my sandwich in an attempt to harm me

Thankfully someone had the antidote for bread and I was fine

Can’t I stab the mold to kill it and then eat it? If that worked for what’s in the sandwich then I fail to see why it wouldn’t work for the mold

Wait, you’re not supposed to pet service dogs?

Huh…if I was running a DnD campaign again I would actually totally do this; ironically my players aren’t…heroic/humble? If the townsfolk began reacting negatively to the characters, the players would just stop fighting the bad guys. Spider-man would continue helping people if they hated him as much as JJ hates him because he can’t help but be heroic, my players would not. I’d have to confine the effects of the newspaper to just the newspaper itself.

Um, for those of us only just now finding out about this situation, what’s the AI issue here? Did they pirate some of Dana’s work with their AI, or is she inherently opposed to AI and Disney is just using it in general and that’s why she’s angry?

Full details: some people glean implications from people’s posts, I just want to clarify: I don’t care about AI, I’m just lost on what’s happening here (I only just discovered Dana Terrace exists after only just recently watching the owl house and being told about her other works, so I’m curious about if her stuff is being pirated by Disney via whatever AI stuff they’re doing)

Forget tasted it, some people just flat out ate it, such as Galen Winsor

“There’s dozens of us! Dozens!”

Where’s the level 20 retired adventurers? I just see four average babushkas

“I’m having a cyclops blindingly good time!”

If this king doesn’t have access to wizards casting every defensive spell in the player’s handbook on him every single day of his life, wearing the best magical armor in the world that glamors into ordinary royal attire, with defensive wards cast around his immediate vicinity every day, and he just let adventurers stroll into his castle armed while he was being lax with all these precautions, then he deserves to get Kirked.

Yes

“Oh the monk is immune to poison?! Well hah! …I completely forgot”