“The animals were not in any of the images.”
She realized immediately it was recorded in her house, because her bathroom is covered in a distinctly patterned tile. Joudrey LeBlanc then paid $7.99 for a month’s subscription to the dog-sitter’s page, where she discovered the explicit content.
lmao she still paid for it and afaik there is not any real legal ramifications for the dog sitter since this is kind of uncharted territory in terms of laws, so basically she just made this girls account get a shitload of free advertising while giving her money.
Yeah, IDGAF if someone is masturbating in my home, as long as they follow two rules: clean it up, and no pictures of my home. That’s just rude as fuck for even a guest, much less someone that’s being paid to primarily pay attention to the animals. You can’t actually do both and do them right.
On top of that, I would also be concerned about personal/private information potentially being published if they’re careless about what’s in the background of their footage.
And exif data
If the Onlyfans model isn’t stripping out exif data already they have larger problems than pissing off the person they’re dogsitting for.
Good point. Like SolOrion hinted, I hope they strip EXIF.
But if not, when some babysitter takes a video and an expensive item is visible in it, a savvy thief might target it.
