• Earlier this year ICE ordered new vehicles equipped with smartphone-tracking hardware.
  • Cell-tower simulating “Stingray” devices gather records on phones in their vicinity.
  • Luckily, Android 16 includes new measure for detecting when you may be monitored in this fashion.
  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 个月前

    Users who have already updated their phones to Android 16 can even tap into some system-level protection with the new “Network notifications” option

    Wanna bet that feature will soon be cut by google? For your safety of course.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 个月前

        GrapheneOS is built from Android, right? Wouldn’t subsequent versions of GrapheneOS lose this functionality as well?

        • azuth@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 个月前

          Only if Google makes such sweeping changes to make forward-porting the feature impossible.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 个月前

            Must be frustrating to keep so many patch sets alive after a while. Any insight into how they do this in a scalable way?

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 个月前

            Ah, shame. I still consider the 10 to be a downgrade from my 9 Pro. I want Battery Share.

            I’m also less likely to be subjected to surveillance, I’m guessing, as I live in northern Europe. Hopefully. 😅

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 个月前

              These devices are installed in public spaces. Think Transit stations.

              I doubt north european security services operate any differently

              Plus you got russia all up yalls ass too

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 个月前

                Right, but considering where in northern Europe I live… I don’t think we’re a target before it’s time to upgrade phones at least, honestly. 😅

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 个月前

    Police and government agencies can track phones even when they’re connected to a genuine cell towers, via mobile operators. It’s just slightly more convenient for them to use an ISMI catcher because they collect data without going through a third party.

    Assume a mobile phone can be tracked if it’s powered, regardless of iOS or Android version and settings.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 个月前

          They don’t fully turn off. I don’t remember the official name for it, but it’s a low energy state. It’s how Apple can track your stolen MacBook or iphone, even if the thief turned it off.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      Always has been. JPEG

      Shit is so easy, fucking chinaman and vatniks been doing it for at least decade, that we all know of.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 个月前

    too bad android 16 also has the garbage “registered developers” and blocking apk installs insuring i’ll never upgrade.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 个月前

      Good but it isn’t the version of Android it is in Google Play Services. So however far back Google is pushing the current version for.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 个月前

      I’m using f-droid on 16 without issues (so far)

      That’s coming next year AFAIK, and I don’t think staying on 15 will prevent it

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 个月前

    Is there really any chance they don’t have direct access to data from the cell towers and actually need to do tracking by other means? I figured this was just a parallel construction type of thing.

    • HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 个月前

      Time to tell on myself a bit, I was a 35N in the US army with experience adjacent to this subject. Stingrays are commercially available devices that pretty much anybody with big money can get their hands on and use. Private companies make various stingray-type devices and those private companies have salesmen who actively want to sell YOU on buying their equipment.

      For law enforcement, getting a continuing agreement with telecommunication companies to have legal access to bulk USP data is a big nightmare with lots of red tape. Even if a police department were to get these agreements with the telecommunications company you’re now introducing all of the inconvenience of dealing with AT&T customer support to get your data from them. This isn’t a joke, pretty often you will still have to work with/through the telecommunications company you have an agreement with to get your data. And to be honest their techs and reps are dumb as bricks, they are so often a common pain point.

      Setting up a stingray on the other hand gives the police department direct access to all the data themselves with no middle-men, and often they even have supplemental support from whichever company they bought their stingrays from. It’s easier, faster, and more convenient data collection 99% of the time to not go through the genuine cell towers.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 个月前

        But we’re talking about a federal agency here, not local law enforcement. It’s been confirmed that systems they tried to keep secret exist for them to have direct access to traffic going through ISPs, so why wouldn’t they have set up something similar for wireless networks, that would eliminate the need to go through any corporate bureaucracy? To me it seems reasonable to assume that such programs exist without being divulged because it would be basically similar to what else has been confirmed to exist, and there’s a really obvious incentive.