Hi guys, first of all, I fully support Piracy. But Im writing a piece on my blog about what I might considere as “Ethical Piracy” and I would like to hear your concepts of it.

Basically my line is if I have the capacity of paying for something and is more convinient that pirating, ill pay. It happens to me a lot when I wanna watch a movie with my boyfriend. I like original audio, but he likes dub, so instead of scrapping through the web looking for a dub, I just select the language on the streaming platform. That is convinient to me.

In what situations do you think is not OK to pirate something? And where is 100 justified and everybody should sail the seas instead?

I would like to hear you.

  • charles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Slightly more gray: content I’ve already paid for in one form or another. I spent like $100 going to the theater to see Mario with the family. I’m not losing sleep over adding it to my Plex when it hits VOD.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I pay for a smattering of VoD services, I don’t lose sleep over watching something that isn’t available on them.

      If corporate greed didn’t force a hundred different services on us, then it might be different.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You say you don’t want 100 different services, but do we really want all media content to be under one roof or just a few players? Consolidation is also terrible for media/art. That’s basically why so many people are against the Actibliz acquisition.

          • hoodatninja@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d love that but it’s just not realistic because of how the media publishing landscape currently is. Happy to advocate for that but moving that needle will take decades. My response is it’s usually somewhere in the middle. 5-10 major players, maybe some smaller ones as well. I don’t need access to literally everything ever made. Libraries already have a wonderfully large free collection as it is (for anyone reading this Hoopla is amazing and countless libraries have massive catalogs on it)

            • Kushan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, it’s not an easy thing to achieve for sure, but I won’t lose sleep over them losing revenue because they can’t figure it out quickly enough.

              Even moreso where it comes to media that’s just not available any more. If you, a content IP owner, don’t make that content available for purchase, then you have only yourself to blame if people pirate it.

              • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you, a content IP owner, don’t make that content available for purchase, then you have only yourself to blame if people pirate it.

                I don’t think we are entitled to someone creative work just because they made it. That opens way too many doors.

    • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Paying for a ticket isn’t the same thing and I’d argue that’s not morally justified piracy. You went from a rental to ownership at a rental price.

      I thought you were going to say something like “I already bought a copy of Star Wars thirty years ago, then THEY made the way I watch it obsolete, so I don’t feel as bad getting another copy since I already paid for it once.”

      That would be closer to moral than “well I watched it in the theaters once, so I totally own a copy!”

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is doubly true for games, which tend to be re-released over and over again on different platforms. This is true to a lesser extent for things like movies, but it’s much worse with gaming where each console is a closed ecosystem that’s incompatible with other systems. At least with Blu-Ray, you can expect any Blu-Ray player to play the movie you’ve purchased. It’s not like a Toshiba player will only play Toshiba brand Blu-Ray discs.

      Companies love to use the “you don’t own the game, you own a personal license to use the game” line when revoking rights to play games you’ve legally purchased… But that goes both ways; If you own a personal license to use the game, it shouldn’t matter what platform it’s on, because it’s the same game regardless of whether you’re playing on PlayStation or PC.