beep boop

  • 6 Posts
  • 666 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle









  • I would say the defining difference is that bluesky is not effectively a decentralized service. Federated(decentralized) social media platforms are great because it’s hard for one single company or organization to censor the entire network.

    For mastodon there are some big servers but all the uses are still quite distributed. For bluesky basically all users are registered on a central server run by the company bluesky, which has sole control over what’s allowed and what’s not. This has already been used by them to censor political content.

    In theory blue sky is capable of being kinda decentralized but not really and even if you were to host your own account, they would still be able to censor you.

    So in simple terms it comes down to:

    • Bluesky is just another twitter that will eventually go to shit like every other network (and arguably already has)
    • Mastodon is here to stay and while it might be small by comparison, it will never really die or be controlled by some central entity



  • A privacy preserving location sharing system that shows you a map can only work with offline maps. If the maps arent offline, then that means the server delivering the map data knows where you are.

    I dont know of an offline maps based live location app. There are plenty of non google apps that do this in a non private way as a primary or secondary function. Matrix/Element can do it and there are apps on fdroid (ToLoShare for example), that do it. But all of those have to somehow depend on a server that delivers the map “tiles” (chunks of map data near you) to show you a map. So they are all technically capable of tracking you.

    The only really private way to do this is to share the coordinates through a secure channel in an automated way and then whenever you need it you open those coordinates in you offline maps app (CoMaps for example)